Eight leak sources, compared honestly

This comparison puts eight leak sources side by side using one kind of evidence only: Google's Transparency Report. For each domain, the figure below counts URLs reported to Google in copyright removal requests, at the time of the report data. The figures grow over time. They are not counts of videos, files, creators, or visits, and they are not removals performed by any service. Read on those terms, they offer a fair way to compare reporting scale across very different sites.

LeakGallery is a pirate tube site, and Google's Transparency Report records 7,633,487 URLs reported for this domain. That is the largest figure in this set. Tube sites present copied video on public watch pages, which search engines index and people find by creator name. LeakGallery usually ignores DMCA notices, according to our guides, so the practical response leans on Google delisting: remove its page addresses from search results, and the casual audience that sustains the site falls away.

Deep Warez is a pirate forum and index, and Google's Transparency Report records 5,639,720 URLs reported for this domain. Its threads name copied work, discuss it, and point readers to files held elsewhere. One leak can generate threads, replies, mirrors, and index pages, each with its own reportable address. Deep Warez ignores notices, so the fitting response is to delist thread and index pages with Google while also reporting the file hosts that the threads point toward.

RecTube is a cam-recording tube site, and Google's Transparency Report records 3,346,327 URLs reported for this domain. Its pages are built from recorded live shows, which is why cam performers appear so often in its listings. A recording turns a one-time live event into a permanent public page tied to a room name. RecTube usually ignores notices, so performers should expect the useful route to be delisting, protecting the search results attached to the names they work under.

Uploaded is a file host, and Google's Transparency Report records 2,882,103 URLs reported for this domain. A host stores the files that other sites link to, quietly, without a public stage. Uploaded ignores notices, and delisting is very limited for file hosts because bare file addresses are shared by direct link rather than found in search. The working response targets the pages linking to the files: forums, directories, and indexes whose pages can be reported and delisted.

TorrentProject is a torrent index, and Google's Transparency Report records 2,388,191 URLs reported for this domain. An index hosts nothing itself. It catalogs torrent entries so people can find files shared from elsewhere. That makes its pages pure discovery, and discovery is what delisting removes. Report its entry pages to Google, and chase the sources behind the entries where they can be reached. Arguing with the index alone, as if it held the file, usually wastes time.

Unblocked is a pirate link directory, and Google's Transparency Report records 1,640,066 URLs reported for this domain. Like an index, it hosts nothing. It points people onward, including toward new addresses for sites that moved or were blocked. Its pages become more valuable to its audience whenever destinations change. The response matches the model: remove its linking pages from search, and use its outbound links first as a map of where your work is currently being carried.

Hotleak is a pirate tube site, and Google's Transparency Report records 1,294,578 URLs reported for this domain. Its difference is notice handling, which our guides describe as hit or miss. Some pages may come down after a notice and some may not. That mixed record makes Hotleak the clearest case for filing both ways at once: send the site a DMCA notice for a possible source takedown, and report the same addresses to Google for delisting at the same time, without waiting.

OFHub is a pirate tube site built around subscription-platform leaks, and Google's Transparency Report records 129,000 URLs reported for this domain. Its figure is the smallest here, and that should not be mistaken for the smallest threat. It is focused on exactly the content subscribers pay for, and it usually ignores notices. A focused site with a modest reporting history can still expose a creator whole catalog. The response is delisting, done completely for every page under every working name.

The honest comparison is about types as much as totals. Tube sites are handled through delisting when they ignore notices, with Hotleak filed both ways because its record is mixed. Forums and directories are handled by delisting their pages and following their links. Hosts are handled through the pages that link to them. Indexes are handled by removing their entry pages from search. Nullva files as an authorized agent after bio-code verification, and plans can start with a free scan.